AI Governance Gap Finder
Answer a guided assessment and receive a tailored snapshot of your likely AI governance documentation obligations, documentation gaps, legal-review flags, and priority next steps — based on your jurisdictions, AI use cases, company role, data sensitivity, and vendor setup.
Not legal advice. This assessment provides general AI governance guidance based on the information you provide. It is not legal advice and should be reviewed by qualified counsel before being relied upon for legal, regulatory, or compliance decisions. Results are a point-in-time snapshot based only on the answers provided.
A clear picture of where your documentation stands today.
The snapshot identifies which AI governance documents you likely need, where the gaps are, and where legal review should be prioritized — without trying to be a compliance platform or a document generator.
Snapshot risk score
Directional ratings across regulatory exposure, documentation readiness, vendor evidence, data sensitivity, oversight, and legal-review urgency.
Documentation gap analysis
A clear table showing which documents you appear to have, which look missing, and which need vendor or legal review.
Priority next steps
A short, ranked list of actions and a 0–30 / 30–60 / 60–90 day remediation roadmap tailored to your inputs.
Eight focused steps. One snapshot report.
Each step takes about a minute. Answer "Not sure" anywhere — the snapshot adjusts confidence accordingly.
What this snapshot draws from.
This tool provides a point-in-time documentation snapshot using selected AI governance laws, regulatory trends, and best-practice frameworks. It is not exhaustive and may not include every sector-specific, contractual, local, or international requirement.
Legal obligations are kept clearly separate from best-practice recommendations. This tool does not provide certification or guaranteed compliance.
- EU AI ActLegal obligation
- Selected U.S. state AI lawsLegal obligation
- Colorado AI Act considerationsLegal obligation
- UK AI governance principlesRegulatory guidance
- Selected APAC AI governanceRegulatory guidance
- NIST AI Risk Management FrameworkBest practice
- ISO/IEC 42001Best practice
- Sector-specific warning flagsFlags only
Built for legal, compliance, and AI program leads.
Operating across regions
US, EU, UK, Canada, Brazil, and APAC jurisdictions in one assessment.
Using third-party AI
Vendor evidence gaps surfaced for APIs, embedded SaaS, and customized models.
Making decisions about people
HR, credit, healthcare, education, housing, biometrics, and other consequential uses.
Find out what AI governance documentation your organization likely needs.
A short guided assessment. A point-in-time snapshot. A clear path to action.